PASUPULETI VENKATESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/7935/2025 · 2025-07-10
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12915 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12915 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010153652025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 7935 OF 2025 Between:
1. PASUPULETI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/o.Naga Bushanam, aged about 62 years, R/o.D.No.16-135, Challapalli, Kota Eduruga Challapalli, Krishna District. ...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. The District Collector, Krishna District, Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Praja Parishad, Krishna, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.
4. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Challapalli Mandal, Challapalli, Krishna District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: GHANTASALA UDAYA BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE
2
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri Ghantasala Udaya Bhaskar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner; Sri P. Chaitanya Srinivas, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for ZPPs, MPPs and Gram Panchayat; Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development.
2. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Representation submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 22.02.2025 (Ex.P.2) has been considered and necessary action has been taken. He would, therefore, submit that no further consideration is necessary.
3. In this view of the matter, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. No Order as to Costs.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 11.07.2025 JKS
3
49
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 7935 OF 2025
11.07.2025
JKS