Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129136 (MAD)

V.Moris Babu v. Y.S.Prema Jayasheela

CRP(MD)/1342/2025 · 2025-08-06

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.R.P.(MD)No.1342 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI C.R.P.(MD)No.1342 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.6969 2025 1.V.Moris Babu 2.Hepsiba 3.Anitha 4.Mary ...Petitioners Vs. 1.Y.S.Prema Jayasheela 2.A.Jeenath Arul Akila ...Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to call for the records relating to the proceedings in D.V.O.P. No.46 of 2024, on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate, Mahila Court Nagercoil and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondent No.1 : Mr.C.Murugavel For Respondent No.2 : Dispensed with 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.1342 of 2025 O R D E R This petition has been filed seeking to strike off the impugned proceedings in D.V.O.P.No.46 of 2024, on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate, Mahila Court Nagercoil. 2.The petitioners herein are the respondents in D.V.O.P.No.46 of 2024, before the trial Court. The first respondent herein has filed D.V.O.P.No.46 of 2024, before the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Mahila Court Nagercoil, under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act and BNSS, 2023. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the first petitioner is the husband of the first respondent. The first respondent has initiated domestic violence proceedings against him and his family members. It is submitted that the petitioners are in no way connected with the allegations made by the first respondent in the DVC case. Therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be permitted to raise all the grounds mentioned herein before the trial court. He also requests this Court to dispense with their personal appearance before the trial court. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.1342 of 2025 4.Learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that if this Court is inclined to dispense with the appearances of the petitioners, this Court may impose requisite conditions to see to it that the presence of the petitioners at the times, during which the presence of the petitioners is mandatory be safeguarded so that the petitioners do not frustrate the trial proceedings by dragging on the same to the detriment of the first respondent. 5.This Court, taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, permits the petitioners to raise all the grounds as raised herein before the trial court at the time of trial. Taking into consideration the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, their appearance before the trial court is dispensed with except for their appearance for the purpose of receiving the copy of the proceedings u/s 230 of BNSS, framing of charges, questioning under Section 351 of BNSS and on the day on which judgment is to be pronounced. However, if for any particular reason, the presence of the petitioners is necessary, the trial court, at its wisdom, shall direct them to appear on those days. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.1342 of 2025 6.Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 06.08.2025 Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No MR 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.1342 of 2025 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Mahila Court, Nagercoil. 2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.1342 of 2025 M.DHANDAPANI , J. MR C.R.P.(MD)No.1342 of 2025 06.08.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis