ARTI DEVI v. ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VI LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A483/264/2025 · 2025-04-21
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129135 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129135 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22424 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 264 of 2025 Applicant :- Arti Devi Opposite Party :- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Vi Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ishrat Ali Siddiqui,Mahfooz Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.
2. The present application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./529 BNSS has been filed by the applicant with the following main reliefs:
"Wherefore it is most respectfully to pray that the Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to prevent the abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, be directed to Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VIth, Lucknow, to decide the aforesaid Case No. 52258 of 2016, arising out of Crime No. 73 of 2015 (State Vs Shiv Magan & another), U/S-498-A/323/504/506 I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Gosai Ganj, District Lucknow, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VIth, Lucknow, within a short period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. And/or pass any other or further order deemed just and proper in the circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner."
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has lodged an FIR against the respondent no. 2-husband and respondent no. 3-father in law. The respondent nos. 2 and 3 appeared before the court and they have been granted bail by the court and after enlarged on bail on most of the dates they are not appearing in the court and moving applications for exemption from appearance which have been allowed by the court without assigning any reason and the applicant is waiting for getting justice since the year 2016.
4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has confined his prayer to the extent that a direction may be issued to the court concerned to decide the matter within stipulated time as the court may fix.
5. Learned AGA has no objection with the prayer made by the
learned counsel for the applicant.
6. Accordingly, the application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./529 BNSS is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournments and by giving short dates, provided there is no other legal impediment.
Order Date :- 21.4.2025 AKK Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench