Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12912 (MAD)

R.KUMARAN v. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY

CRL OP/6720/2025 · 2025-03-10

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.6720 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.6720 of 2025 1.R.Kumaran 2.R.Veeramuthu 3.C.Ramanathan 4.Logambal @ R.Rajeswari 5.Raja @ S.P.Rajkumar 6.R.Vellaiammal 7.Bhuvana @ V.Bhuvaneswari ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, AWPS Pallavaram, Chengalpattu District 2.S.Vardhini ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to the FIR in crime No.12 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.C.P.Sivamohan For Respondents For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.6720 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.12 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent, registered for the offences under Sections 376(3), 498(A), 494, 506(1) of IPC and Sections 5(I), 5(n), 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 9 & 10 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. 2. Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3. A Joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 07.01.2025 has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent / the defacto complainant and also by their respective counsel. All the parties are present and identified by their respective counsel and the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.6720 of 2025 4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, quashes the FIR in Crime No.12 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent. 5. In view of the above, the FIR in Crime No.12 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent, is hereby quashed. The terms of Joint Memorandum of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order. Each of the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.1,000/-, (Rupees One Thousand only) as costs, to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Madras High Court, Tamil Nadu, forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.6720 of 2025 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. 10.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.6720 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector of Police, AWPS Pallavaram, Chengalpattu District 2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.6720 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.O.P.No.6720 of 2025 10.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis