2025:JHHC:13552 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2680 of 2025 Sanket Ujjawal, aged about 22 years, s/o Baiju Rai, r/o Block No.34/1, Road No.6 Mandir Ke Pass Colony, PO Tata Nagar, PS Bagbera, Town Jamshedpur, Dist. East Singbhum, Jharkhand …. Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Kr. Karmakar, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Lily Sahay, Advocate ----- 02/06.05.2025: Heard the parties. This anticipatory bail application under sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for the offences registered under sections 407 & 408 of the Indian Penal Code in Kamalpur P.S. Case No. 8 of 2024, pending in the Court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur. The learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no document to suggest that the petitioner has prepared any document to show that he has collected the money; either received from any of the person or deposited in the account of the company. It is submitted that while registering the FIR no document has been filed. There is an allegation against the petitioner that petitioner being the Employee of a Finance Company used to collect money from women groups but he did not deposit the same in the account of the company. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the victims have been examined and their statement have been recorded in the case diary wherein they have stated that this petitioner used to collect the money and assured them that he would arrange loan in their favour. From the argument of the parties, I find that there is an allegation against the petitioner that he used to collect the loan repayment amount from the ladies but he did not deposit the same in the Company. 2025:JHHC:13552 Considering the nature of allegations, I am of the opinion that this is not fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Hence, Accordingly, both anticipatory bail applications are dismissed. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned trial court. (ANANDA SEN, J. ) Anjali/cp3