M/S PARDEEP KUMAR AND CO TH ITS PARTNER PARDEEP KUMAR v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS (R AND B) DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND ANOTHER
WP(C)/2916/2025 · 2025-10-17
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12907 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12907 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 2916/2025
M/s Pardeep Kumar and Co.
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Fahad Bin Ashraf, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and Anr. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 17.10.2025
The pleadings are found to be deficient, and when confronted with the same, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better pleadings. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with all connected application(s), with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 17.10.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 166 Mihul Singh 2025.10.17 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document