IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 466/2024 Decided on: 24.02.2025 Ashok Sharma …Petitioner. Versus Sandeep Kadam & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Kuldeep Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Taking note of the reply filed by the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this contempt petition does not survive and it be accordingly disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his grievance(s), in accordance with law, at an appropriate stage. This is not objected by learned Additional Advocate General. 2. Hence, this petition is accordingly closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty, however, is 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for redressal of his grievance(s), if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 24th February, 2025(rohit)