IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2274 OF 2017 Between: Yedurupad Janardhan, Indian Navy (retd.,) & Director (Technical) (Retd.) Hindustan Shipyard Ltd., Visakhapatnam, S/o.Late Y.Naganna, Flat No.302, Sai Brundavan Apartments, DLR Enclave, Sainikpuri Post, Secunderabad - 500 094. ...Petitioner/Accused No.3 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam, rep by its Standing Counsel for CBI Cases, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent/Complainant Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.PC against the Order dated 28-06-2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.7 of 2016 in C.C.No.47 of 2010 on the file of the II Additional Special Judge for C.B.I. Cases, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. j.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP. NO: 3672 OF 20171 Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.47 of 2010 on the file of the II ■ / f Additional Special Judge for C.B.I. Cases, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case. * Cbif^s^el for the Petitioner :Sri C.Sharan Reddy ' iJ KS'. Cf^hSel for the Respondent: Sri M.Sravan Kumar, Spl. Public Prosecutor for C.B.I. The Court made the following: APHC010153682017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2274/2017 Between: ...PETITIONER Yedurupad Janardhan, Secunderabad. AND The State Of AP Rep Spl PP For CBI Cases ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.CSHARAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.M.SRAVAN KUMAR, Spl. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR C.B.I. The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. C.Sharan Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, the Criminal Revision Case is 2. dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. t 2 As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The III Additional Special Judge for C.B.I. Cases, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, (with records) 2. The Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. One CC to Sri C.Sharan Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to the Special Public Prosecutor for C.B.I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 6. Three CD Copies BSV sree HIGH COURT 1 DATED:09/05/2025 ORDER ^rot=ANDs;q^ CRLRC.No.2274 of 2017 S 13 AUG 2fl;>5 S Current Section .y. DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS