Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:47726-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 693 of 2020 Gurmeet Singh Bhalla S/o Late Baba Avtar Singh Bhalla Aged About 73 Years R/o D-2, 602, V.I.P. Karishma Apartment, Near Tv Tower, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, P/s Civil Line, Tehsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Superintendent of Police District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. SHO Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Anil Daga S/o Late Bitthal Das Daga Aged About 56 Years R/o Shiv Bag, Jeean Bima Marg, Pandari, Tehsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Complainant)
...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Swajeet Ubjea, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 4 : Ms. Aditi Singhvi, Advocate. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.09.19 10:32:11 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
17.09.2025
1. No one has appeared, nor has any representation been made, on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition.
2. Mr. Swajeet Ubjea, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3/State as well as Ms. Aditi Singhvi, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 4, are present.
3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and set-aside/quash the FIR No. 113 of 2020 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 420 of the IPC, registered by Police of the Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), in the interest of justice.”
4.
Learned counsel for respondent No. 4 submits that, during the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner has passed away. Hence, the petition has become infructuous.
5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for respondent No. 4, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice
Brijmohan