MOHD IQBAL AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2899/2025 · 2025-10-17
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12902 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12902 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No.
WP(C) No. 2899/2025 CM No. 6675/2025 Date of pronouncement:- 17.10.2025 Date of uploading:- 17.10.2025
Mohd. Iqbal and ors . …..Appellants
Through: Mr. Vinod Kotwal, Advocate .
Vs
UOI and ors.
.…. Respondents
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. Vipan Gandotra, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 17.10.2025
1. The grievance of the petitioners is that their land measuring 24 kanals 09 marlas falling in khasra No. 18 situated at village Sitni Nagrota, Jammu has been acquired by the respondents for widening/four laning of Delhi-Ludhiana-Amritsar-Katra Expressway in terms of award dated 01.11.2022 leaving the petitioners without any land.
2. It has been submitted that in the previous past also, land of the petitioners has been taken over by Military as a result of which, the petitioners have not been left with any land. It has been submitted that on the previous occasion, the petitioners had invoked writ jurisdiction of this Court seeking denotification of the aforesaid land and this Court vide order dated 19.03.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 2458/2022 had directed the respondents to consider and decide his representation after affording an opportunity of hearing Sr. No. 171
2 WP(C) No. 2899/2025
to the petitioners but the said order has not been complied with by the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners would feel satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents treat the present writ petition as representation and decide the same in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Nos. 3 & 4 to treat the present writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioners and accord
consideration to the same after hearing the petitioners in accordance with law. A decision thereon shall be taken within a period of one month from the date, a copy of the writ petition and coy of this order is made available by the petitioners to respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
5.
Disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
17.10.2025
Tarun/PS
Mahavir Singh 2025.10.17 01:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document