Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1290 (UTT)

SHILPA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

HABC/1/2025 · 2025-02-24

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1303-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UHABC/1/2025 UHon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. UHon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General assisted by G.C. Joshi, AGA for the State. Mr. Amanjot Singh Chadha, Advocate for the respondent. 2. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the mother, alleging that her husband (respondent No. 4) has forcibly taken away her son Master Dharvik Singh, and her son is now in illegal custody of her husband. 3. Since father’s custody of the child cannot be termed as ‘illegal’, therefore, there is no scope for interference in this Habeas Corpus Petition. 4. Mr. Bhatia, learned counsel for the petitioner has informed that petitioner has moved application before appropriate Court at Dehradun for custody of the child, therefore no useful purpose would be served by keeping this Habeas Corpus Petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. 6. The Court concerned shall make efforts for reconciliation between the parties and also permit the petitioner to meet with the child for a short while within Court premises. 7. Vakalatnama, filed by Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner in Court today, is taken on record. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 24.02.2025 Mahinder/ 2025:UHC:1303-DB