- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19022 RP No. 13 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ REVIEW PETITION NO. 13 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI RAMESH ANANDA POOJARY S/O ANANDA POOJARI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, SAI KRUPA NEAR YUVAKA MANDALA, HALEYANGADI, MANGALORE-574146 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKHIL S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BHARATH CO OPERATIVE BANK REGISTERED OFFICE AT MOHAN TERRACE, 64/72, MODY STREET, FORT MUMBAI-400063 REP BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, AND DY GENERAL MANAGER 2. 3. THE BHARATH CO OPERATIVE BANK MULKY BRANCH, SHAMBAHAVI COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, NEAR BUS STAND MULKY, MANGALORE-574154 REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER …RESPONDENTS ASREC INDIA LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: SOLITAIRE CORPORATE PARK, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19022 RP No. 13 of 2023 BUILDING NO.2, UNIT NO. 201-202 A & 200-202 B, GR FLOOR, ANDHERI GHATKOPAR LING RD. CHAKALA, ANDHERI(E), MUMBAI-400093 THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SRI VIKAS G. KANADE. …IMPLEADING APPLICANT (BY SRI. PUNDIKAI ISHWARA BHAT., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 SRI VIGNESH SHETTY AND SMT. NATASHA N. MURTHY., ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT AS R3) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII, RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 27.01.2022 PASSED IN W.P.NO.36408/2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Review the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in W.P.No.36408/2018 vide Annexure-A. b. Grant such other and further relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19022 RP No. 13 of 2023 2. A memo dated 23.4.2025 signed by the Petitioner and the counsel for the Petitioner has been filed, which reads as under:- “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The counsel for the Petitioner submits that both the parties had compromised the dispute by settlement. The Respondent agreed to release the title document by closing the loan account of petitioner by receiving 10,00,000/- as full and final. Hence this Hon’ble court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above case in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. Accepting the said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1