Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12897 (PAT)

Radha Devi v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./8087/2025 · 2025-03-06

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8087 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-864 Year-2024 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1. Radha Devi W/O Brahmdeo Yadav R/O vill- Godhiyari, Ward no.- 4, Sahugar-1, P.O and P.s - Madhepura, Dist.- Madhepura 2. Annu Kumari W/O Rahul Kumar R/O vill- Godhiyari, Ward no.- 4, Sahugar- 1, P.O and P.s - Madhepura, Dist.- Madhepura 3. Sonam Kumari @ Sonu Kumari W/O Mukul Kumar R/O vill- Godhiyari, Ward no.- 4, Sahugar-1, P.O and P.s - Madhepura, Dist.- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 352,109,117(2), 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners entered the house of the informant and assaulted the informant causing her injuries. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that due to land dispute, marpit took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8087 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/2 Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in Madhepura Police Station Case No. 864 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 of the the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. shashi/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T