NO E/5025890 EX FRN /PLUMBER SONU KUMAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
WP(C)/2855/2025 · 2025-08-03
Soumitra Saikia
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12897 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12897 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010109062025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2855/2025 NO E/5025890 EX FRN /PLUMBER SONU KUMAR S/O SRI VISHAMBAR DAYAL DISMISSED FROM SERVICE 38TH ASSAM RIFLES SRIKONA SILCHAR ASSAM C/O 99APO PIN 932038 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REP BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI 110001 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES HEAD QUARTER DIRECTORATE GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG MEGHALAYA 3:THE COMMANDANT 38TH ASSAM RIFLES SRIKONA SILCHAR ASSAM C/O 99APO PIN 93203 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR V KUMAR, MR B PATHAK,MS M TIWARI,MR. T NATH Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. R K D CHOUDHURY (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA)
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 04.08
.2025 Heard Mr. B. Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned DSGI for the respondents. Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned DSGI for the respondents submits that the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been disposed of by the Appellate Authority by appellate order dated 15.12.2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner on the other hand submits that the same however, is not served immediately on the petitioner therefore, they were not aware of the disposing of the appeal at the time of the present writ petition has been filed. The learned DSGI has served a copy of the order on the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the order being passed, the said order will be required to be assailed separately, therefore, the present writ petition is not pressed. Accordingly, WP(C) No. 2855/2025 is dismissed as not pressed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any is also dismissed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the appellate order. JUDGE Comparing Assistant