IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 210 RSA-4033-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision:12.12.2025 Sucha Singh and Others …..Appellants Vs. Jita Singh .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Naresh Prabhakar, Advocate for the appellants. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants informs that despite all possible efforts, the par$es i.e. appellants are not contac$ng. Even no$ce issued to the respondent received back unserved with the report that he is mentally retarded, as reported by the registry. In the aforesaid circumstances, when counsel for the appellants has no further instruc$ons; and appellants are not responding to their counsel, the Court is le+ with no op$on, but to dispose of the present appeal for want of prosecu$on with liberty to the appellants to get the same revived, in case, any cause of ac$on survives. Pending applica$on(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE December 12, 2025 Nee$ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.12.13 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document