- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19793 RSA No. 80 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.80 OF 2016 BETWEEN: SRI MADDAPPA S/O SRI MUNI NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, R/AT SHANUBHOGANAHALLI, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT …APPELLANT (BY SRI MADAPPA, APPELLANT -ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI NARAYANA S/O SRI THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT SHANUBHOGANAHALLI, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 2. SRI.N.R.BHAT S/O SRI GANAPATHI BHAT, MAJOR, R/AT #102, RANKA PARK, RICHMOND CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 025. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 9.10.2015 PASSED IN RA NO.31/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE III Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19793 RSA No. 80 of 2016 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SIT AT ANEKAL, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.3.2009 PASSED IN O.S NO.397/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, ANEKAL. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDER, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT This regular second appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 09.10.2015, passed in R.A.No.31/2009 by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, sitting at Anekal and the judgment and decree dated 21.03.2009, passed in O.S.No.397/2005 by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC., Anekal. 2. It was reported that the counsel appearing for the appellant is no more. 3. This court vide order dated 30.10.2019 issued a Court notice to the appellant. The learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, sitting at Anekal, vide communication dated 09.12.2019 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19793 RSA No. 80 of 2016 addressed to the learned Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, stated that the notice has been duly served on the appellant personally. 4. The appellant has received the Court notice on 29.11.2019. Despite service of Court notice, the appellant has not taken any steps to engage the counsel. The appeal is of the year 2016. It shows that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Today i.e., 10.06.2025 case called none appears for the appellant. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non compliance of the office objections. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34