Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12895 (GAU)

HUSSAIN MD ROFIQUZZAMAN v. UCO BANK AND ANR

WP(C)/2785/2025 · 2025-05-25

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010108612025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2785/2025 HUSSAIN MD ROFIQUZZAMAN (PROPRIETOR OF ZAMAN ENTERPRISE) SON OF LATE ISMAIL HUSSAIN , RESIDENT OF NAYAHAT BAZAR, BARKANDA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783348 VERSUS UCO BANK AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS ZONAL OFFICER, ZONAL OFFICE, UN BEZBARUAH ROAD, KRISHNA NAGAR, SILPUKHURI, GUWAHATI-781003, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2:AUTHORIZED OFFICER UCO BANK ZONAL OFFICE UN BEZBARUAH ROAD KRISHNA NAGAR SILPUKHURI GUWAHATI-781003 KAMRUP (M) ASSA For the Petitioner : Mr. G. L. Bora, Advocate Mr. S.N. Krishnatraya, Advocate Page No.# 2/2 For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M. Sharma, res-1 &2, Advocate. Ms. S. Yasmin, Advocate. - BEFORE- HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE 26.05.2025. (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) After attempting to argue the matter for quite some time, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, has submitted that he wants to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the DRT against the sale notice issued by the respondent Bank while exercising the power under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant