Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12894 (RAJ)

DINESH KUMAR S/O SHRI SHOBHARAM JAAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/88/2025 · 2025-05-13

Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:20131-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 88/2025 Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Shobharam Jaat, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Kayasth Mohallakasba Nagar Tehsil Ps Nagar District Deeg Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, District Deeg 4. Inspector General, Bharatpur 5. S.h.o. Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur. 6. Shubham Gurjer S/obhagwan Singh Singh Gurjer, Resident Village Sundarawali Nagar, District Deeg 7. Mohit S/o Jeetu, Village Sunderawali, Nagar, District Deeg 8. Ramveer S/o Unkonwn, Village Margpur Govindgarh, Alwar 9. Brijesh S/o Fateh Singh, Village Sarampur Nagar District Deeg ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Meenaskhi Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar & Mr. Sudesh Saini, AGA Mr. Ram Bharosi, CI, SHO with Ms. Suman, FC,09,Police Station -Nagar, Bharatpur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 13/05/2025 1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner (father) seeking custody of the corpus-his daughter. 2. Today the concerned police officials have produced the corpus before us along with the report which is taken on record. [2025:RJ-JP:20131-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-88/2025] 3. As per the certificate of Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, the date of birth of the corpus is 11.09.2008, which has not been disputed either by counsel for the petitioner or by learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General, the corpus is a minor girl. 4. We have interacted with the corpus, who firmly states before us that she does not want to go with her father-petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that the corpus is minor girl, we deem it proper to direct the concerned police officials, who are present today in the Court to admit the corpus in Rajkiya Balika Grah, Bharatpur. Corpus will remain in Rajkiya Balika Grah, Bharatpur till she attains the age of majority. However, if during the intervening period, the corpus wishes to go with her parents, she may be sent with them after necessary verification. Superintendent /In-charge/ Caretaker, Rajkiya Balika Grah, Bharatpur is directed not to permit anyone else to meet the corpus other than her parents. 6. In this view of the matter, the habeas corpus petition stands disposed of accordingly. The parents of the corpus are at liberty to meet the corpus as per Rules in the Rajkiya Balika Grah Bharatpur. 7. A copy of this order be provided to the learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General and a copy be also sent to the Superintendent /In-charge/ Caretaker of Rajkiya Balika Grah, Bharatpur for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Anu /C-1