SANNI ANSARI ALIAS MD SUNNY ANSRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2950/2024 · 2025-03-05
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12894 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12894 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2950 of 2024
------
1. Sanni Ansari @ Md. Sunny Ansri (Withdrawn vide order dated 27.06.2024)
2. Maksud Akram @ Md. Maksud Akram, age about 34 years, S/o Late Md. Zafar Ansari, R/o Coolipara, P.O. & P.S. –Sahibganj (Town), District –Sahibganj (Jharkhand)
… Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Mohua Palit, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.06 Dated- 05.03.2025
Heard the parties.
Perusal of the record reveals that the prayer for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail of the petitioner no.1 –Sanni Ansari @ Md. Sunny Ansri has been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated
27.06.2024.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner no.2 –Maksud Akram @ Md. Maksud Akram has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Borio (J) P.S. Case No.19 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467/468/471/419/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 7(3) of the Lottery Regulation Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 submits that the allegation against the petitioner no.2 is that the petitioner no.2 was involved in selling lottery tickets illegally. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner no.2 are all false and the petitioner no.2 has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-12 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner no.2 undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner no.2 be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the petitioner no.2 be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sahibganj, in connection with Borio (J) P.S. Case No.19 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner no.2 will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-