Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL.OP(MD) No.5809 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.04.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.5809 of 2025 and CRL. MP(MD)No.4210 of 2025
1. Varatharajan
2. Vasanthi @ Vasantha
3. Karpagam
4. Gayathri
5. Ganesan
6. Ravi ..Petitioners .vs.
1. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Police Station Sivagangai District
2. Sharmila Banu ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records in C.C.No.211 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sivagangai and quash the same. For petitioners : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr. M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl side)
For R2 : Mrs.P.Pradeepa _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.OP(MD) No.5809 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings pending in C.C.No.211 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sivagangai
2. Based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the police has registered FIR in Crime No.3 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 466,468,471,420,120(B) of IPC. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsels on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in C.C.No.211 of 2024, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court. 4. Today, the defacto-complainant and the accused are present and the Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto- complainant represented that they entered into a compromise. A compromise memo, dated 27.03.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsels, is also filed before this Court. _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.OP(MD) No.5809 of 2025
5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo. 6. Considering the nature of the offences, the relationship between the parties and they have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition. 7. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and C.C.No.211 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sivagangai is quashed. The compromise memo dated 27.03.2025 filed by the parties shall form part of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
25.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No aav _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.OP(MD) No.5809 of 2025 To
1. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Police Station Sivagangai District 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.OP(MD) No.5809 of 2025 P.DHANABAL,J. aav Crl.OP(MD) No.5809 of 2025 25.04.2025 _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis