Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128908 (PNJ)

M/S GURDAS CHAND RAJINDER KUMAR v. GURDARSHAN SINGH KUNDAL AND ORS

COCP/5012/2024 · 2025-02-21

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP No.5012 of 202 IN TH 128 M/S GURDAS C GURDARSHAN CORAM: HON' Present: Ms. K Mr. R Mr. A HARKESH MAN 1. Lear Assistant from the Distt. Sri Muktsa however, respond lakhs approximat petitioner positive 2. In vi counsel for the pe to avail appropria with law. 3. Dism discharged. 4. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioner tow listing of revival a February 21, 20 Atik Wheth Wheth 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De AS CHAND RAJINDER KUMAR Vs HAN SINGH KUNDAL AND ORS ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Ms. Kirandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the p Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel on instruct om the office of Block Development a uktsar Sahib submits that though p espondents on verification were able oximately and the said payment sha ositively within next two working day In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioner does not press the prese propriate remedies with respect to th Dismissed as not pressed with th However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioner wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from er towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.5012 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 21.02.2025 ......Petitioner RS ....Respondents ESH MANUJA r the petitioner. nstructions from Sh. Gurpreet Sing ment and Panchayat Officer, Gidarbah ugh petitioner claimed Rs.7.34 lakh able to verify the bills worth Rs.4.7 nt shall be released in favour of th g days from today. ertaking by the respondent(s), learne e present petition, however seeks liber t to the remaining dues, in accordanc ith the aforesaid liberty. Rule stand is not done within the aforementione er would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o , immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 Singh, darbaha, 4 lakhs, Rs.4.72 of the rned liberty ordance stands ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.24 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment