IN THE H TALJINDER K STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present : Mr Ms. MANISHA BAT 1. This grant of regular 02.07.2023 regis (Sections 307, 32 District Amritsa dismissed vide o 2. The statement record therein that on Karandeep Singh at about 7.30-8:0 an attack upon h of them were arm HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Reserved Pronounc ER KUMAR ALIAS HONEY KUM Versus F PUNJAB HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Kulwinder Singh, Advocate for Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, A.A.G, Punjab **** A BATRA, J. (oral) This is the second petition filed u gular bail to the petitioner in case ar registered under Sections 323, 32 07, 326 and 325 of IPC added later o ritsar Rural. The previous petition vide order dated 09.08.2024 passed in The aforementioned FIR had bee recorded by the complainant-Raide at on 18.06.2023, he along with his Singh @ Laddu had gone to Attari C 8:00 PM, when the petitioner alon pon his friends Arshdeep Singh and K ere armed with weapons. The petitione AB AND HARYANA RH M No.58048 of 2024 erved on : 27.02.2025 nounced on: 01.03.2025 KUMAR ALIAS HUNNY …. Petitioner …. Respondent MANISHA BATRA ate for the petitioner. njab. filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for ase arising out of FIR No.109 dated 324, 506, 148 and 149 of IPC later on), at Police Station Gharinda, petition as filed by him had been sed in CRM-M-5127-2024. d been registered on the basis of Raideep Singh @ Joban alleging th his friends Arshdeep Singh and ttari Chowk for some personal work r along with co-accused had opened and Karandeep Singh @ Laddu. All titioner had struck blows with kirpan . for ated IPC inda, been is of g and work ened All irpan Jyoti 2025.03.01 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document on the person of Arshdeep Singh had fled away. registration of th investigation, off petitioner was ar at this instance. T along with the co offences. 3. It is falsely implicate which has not b petitioner had be of his body and h long. The trial i case is on simila 04.01.2024. His prolonged period seeking concess released on bail. 4. Stat submitted therein that there are s forming an unla CRM-M No.58048 of 2024 son of Arshdeep Singh. The other ass Singh and Karandeep Singh @ Ladd way. Injured were rushed to the hos n of the FIR, investigation proceedin on, offences under Section 307, 325 an was arrested on 29.07.2023. The weap ance. The investigation stands conclud co-accused is facing trial for com It is argued by learned counsel for licated in this case. There is delay of not been satisfactorily explained. T had been sustained by the victim-Ars y and have been opined to be simple in rial is likely to take time. Co-accus similar footing, had already been gra . His further incarceration would not period of his incarceration has cer oncession of bail. Therefore, it is u n bail. Status report has already been filed therein and learned Additional Advoca are serious and specific allegations n unlawful assembly with the co-ac 024 -2- her assailants also caused injuries to Laddu and thereafter the assailants he hospital and were treated. After ceedings were initiated. During the 325 and 326 of IPC were added. The weapon used by him was recovered oncluded and presently the petitioner r commission of the aforementioned el for the petitioner that he has been lay of 14 days in lodging of the FIR ined. The injuries attributed to the Arshdeep Singh on non-vital part ple in nature. He is in custody since accused Gurjit Singh Bhatti whose en granted bail by the trial Court on ld not serve any useful purpose. The as certainly made him entitled for it is urged that he deserves to be n filed by the respondent-State. It is dvocate General, Punjab has argued ations against the petitioner as by accused and in prosecution of es to lants After the . The ered ioner oned been FIR the part since hose rt on . The for o be It is gued s by n of Jyoti 2025.03.01 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document common object grievous injuries fracture on front be dangerous to making a detaile out for grant of petition does not 4. I ha 5. The with the co-accu caused injuries to The injury that h victim-Arshdeep injuries that had him. Co-accused since been extend extended the sam any useful purpo 6. Kee opinion that the petition is allowe furnishing fresh satisfaction of Magistrate conce CRM-M No.58048 of 2024 bject of that unlawful assembly, he juries on the person of the victim-Ars frontal and parietal bone. The said i ous to life. His previous petition had detailed discussion. No new and subs ant of bail to the petitioner. Therefor es not deserve to be allowed. I have heard learned counsel for the The petitioner is alleged to have f accused and in prosecution of com uries to the victims- Arshdeep Singh an that had been attributed to the petition hdeep Singh. This injury was declared had been opined to be dangerous to ccused Gurjit Singh Bhatti whose ca extended benefit of bail. On parity, th same benefit. His further incarcera purpose. Keeping in view the above discusse at the petition deserves to the allow allowed and petitioner is ordered to be fresh personal and surety bonds to th n of the learned trial Court/Chi concerned 024 -3- y, he had caused simple as well as Arshdeep Singh. He had sustained said injury had also been opined to n had been dismissed on merits by d substantive ground has been made erefore, it is urged that the present or the parties at considerable length. have formed an unlawful assembly of common object thereof, to have ingh and Karandeep Singh @ Laddu. etitioner is on left elbow joint of the eclared to be grievous in nature. The rous to life has not been attributed to ose case is on similar footing, has the petitioner, too deserves to be arceration is also not going to serve scussed facts, I am of the considered allowed. Accordingly, the present d to be released on bail subject to his s to the extent of two sureties rt/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty ll as ined ed to ts by ade esent mbly have ddu. f the The ed to has to be serve ered esent o his Duty Jyoti 2025.03.01 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 01.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.58048 of 2024 (M Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/N Whether reportable : Yes/N 024 -4- (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE es/No. es/No Jyoti 2025.03.01 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document