Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:20961
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1481 of 2022 1 - Fagulal Singh S/o Late Guman Singh Aged About 67 Years Occupation- Business, Resident Of Sabzi Mandi, Sanjay Market Complex, Raigarh, Tahsil And District- Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Harish Kumar S/o Motiram Aged About 44 Years Occupation- Business, Resident Of Sabzi Mandi, Sanjay Market Complex, Raigarh, Tahsil And District- Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Raigarh, District- Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3 - Nazul Officer Raigarh, District- Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Municipal Corporation Raigarh, Through The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, Town Hall, Raigarh, District- Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.05.09 19:22:07 +0530
2
Order on Board 07/05/2025
1. Heard Mr. Hari Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Khulesh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent/s as well as Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent No.4.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition as till date no any
order has been passed by the Municipal Corporation, however, liberty as sought is granted to the petitioner to file fresh duly constituted petition at appropriate stage, in case, exigency arises.
3. Prayed made by the learned counsel for the petitioners has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents.
4. Permission is granted.
5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi