PNO-840650540 SUB INSPECTOR MAHENDRA KUMAR PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY .HOME DEPTT. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/2985/2025 · 2025-03-20
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16230 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2985 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pno-840650540 Sub Inspector Mahendra Kumar Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy .Home Deptt. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner is working on the post of Sub Inspector in the CBCID Headquarter at Lucknow and he was transferred to Lucknow Zone by means of order dated 28.06.2024. Despite the order being passed in June 2024, the petitioner continued to work on the said post till he is relieved by means of order dated
04.03.2025. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is going to retire from service after attaining the age of superannuation on 31.01.2026, which is eleven months away and claims the benefit of the policy dated 22.06.2017 where the persons, who is less than one year to retire should be kept in the same place where they are working. 3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case the petitioner is permitted to move an appropriate application before the respondent no. 2 i.e.,
Deputy
Inspector
General
of
Police (Establishment/Karmik), D.G.P. Headquarter, Lucknow or before the Police Commissioner, Lucknow raising his all grievances and the said authority may be directed to consider and disposed of the said application within a stipulated period of time. 4. Learned Standing Counsel does not oppose the prayer made by the petitioner. 5. In light of the above, with the consent of parties this writ petition is disposed of at the admission state with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the
respondent no. 2 i.e., Deputy Inspector General of Police (Establishment/Karmik), D.G.P. Headquarter, Lucknow or before the Police Commissioner, Lucknow within two weeks from today and in case such an application is moved, the said authority shall consider and decide the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law within two weeks thereafter by a speaking and reasoned order and communicate the decision to the petitioner.
Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench