HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No.1127 of 2024 Shivam Agrawal ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent Present:- Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant Shivam Agrawal seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 838 of 2024, under Sections 323, 377, 498-A, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Manglore, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that it is a matrimonial discord. The applicant has already been granted ad-interim protection. 4. Learned State counsel would submit that the victim has supported the prosecution case. 5. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that this is a case fit for anticipatory bail. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 2 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation. (ii) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. (iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 07.01.2025 Jitendra