[2025:RJ-JP:26767] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1708/2025 1. Banwari Lal Meena Son Of Shri Pooranmal Meena, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Ramola Wali Dhani, Phulera, District Dausa. 2. Rajesh Gurjar Son Of Shri Kailash Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Syaluta, Tehsil And District Alwar. 3. Ajay Kumar Son Of Shri Mukesh Kumar, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Bairwa Dhani, Rehdia, Chandera, District Dausa. 4. Sachin Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Goverdhan Lal Meena, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Nathalvara, P.s. Tehla, District Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Harbhajan Meena Son Of Shri Ramprasad Meena, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Gullana Ki Dhani, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Singh For State For Complainant : : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Govind Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 17/07/2025 1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a prayer to quash the FIR No. 42/2025 registered at Police Station Baswa District Dausa for offences under Sections 309(6), 140(3) and 351(2) of BNS, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute. 2. Learned counsel for both the parties, in presence of their respective clients, have submitted that the dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties amicably. [2025:RJ-JP:26767] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1708/2025] 3. Heard and considered. 4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced below: “12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable.” 5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition. Compromise is taken on record. 6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 42/2025 registered at Police Station Baswa District Dausa with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /19