Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12884 (GAU)

AZIR UDDIN @ SHEIKH AZIR UDDIN @ AZIR UDDIN SHEIKH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1148/2025 · 2025-06-22

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010108562025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1148/2025 AZIR UDDIN @ SHEIKH AZIR UDDIN @ AZIR UDDIN SHEIKH SON OF LATE RAJAB ALI SHEIKH, VILLAGE- MOHANPUR GRANTH, P.O. MOHANPUR, P.S. ALGAPUR, DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA, MS S R MAZARBHUIYA,MS A BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 23.06.2025 1. Heard learned counsel Mr. A.M.Barbhuiya for the petitioner Azir Uddin @ Sheikh Azir Uddin @ Azir Uddin Sheikh who has filed this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 with prayer for pre-arrest bail apprehending arrest in connection with PRC Case No. 595/2024 (arising out of Algapur PS Case No. 45/2024) under Sections 302/201 of the IPC. Page No.# 2/3 2. Learned Addl.Public Prosecutor Mr.K.Baishya is present for the State respondent. 3. The petitioner has been shown as absconder in the charge sheet and summons has been issued against him. The petitioner has approached the Sessions Court for pre-arrest bail but the bail petition was rejected in connection with Criminal Misc. (B) No.111/2025 and vide order dated 16.05.2025, learned Additional Sessions Judge has rejected the petitioner’s prayer for pre-arrest bail. Now the petitioner is before this court. 5. I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection. 6. Learned Addl.Public Prosecutor has raised serious objection in granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner stating that the FIR clearly indicates that the petitioner is responsible for the victim’s death. 7. I have scrutinised the trial court records. 8. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that charge sheet has been laid against the petitioner on conclusion that the death was ante-mortem hanging. The petitioner is apprehending arrest as summons has been issued against the petitioner and he has been shown as absconder in the charge sheet. It is also submitted that the petitioner is willing to co-operate with the trial. 9. Learned Addl.Public Prosecutor has raised objection by stating that death was opined as ante-mortem hanging. The petitioner’s body was found in a pool of water. 10. At this juncture, I have taken a pragmatic view. Learned jurisdictional court has issued summons against the petitioner and the petitioner is also willing to cooperate with the trial. Page No.# 3/3 11. It appears that pre-arrest bail may be granted to the petitioner. 12. The petitioner named above is directed to approach the Eleka Magistrate/ jurisdictional Court and apply for bail. The learned Court shall enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with a suitable surety of like amount to his/ her satisfaction. The learned court may impose any condition to secure the attendance of the petitioner. 13. In terms of the above observations, the pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant