IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M. A. No. 265 of 2009 ----- Ashok Kumar Mukherjee, S/o Late Bijan Kumar Mukherjee, R/o European Quarters, Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S.-Chaibasa, Dist.-West Singhbhum … …. Appellant Versus 1. Amit Kumar Mukherjee, S/o Shri Amulya Kumar Mukherjee, R/o European Quarters, Chaibasa, , P.O. & P.S.-Chaibasa, Dist.- Singhbhum West 2. Dilip Kumar Mukherjee, S/o Late Narendra Nath Mukherjee, R/o European Quarters, Ward No. 9 Chaibasa, , P.O. & P.S.-Chaibasa, Dist.-West Singhbhum, presently residing at A-163, Sector 15, P.O. & P.S.-Sector-15, Noida (Uttar Pradesh) 3. Ashish Kumar Mukherjee, S/o Late Bijan Kumar Mukherjee, R/o European Quarters, Ward No. 9 Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S.-Chaibasa, Dist.-West Singhbhum, presently residing at Qr. No. 2565/B, Sector- II, Site-5, P.O & P.S.-Jagannathpur, Dist.-Ranchi 4. Alok Kumar Mukherjee, S/o Late Bijan Kumar Mukherjee, R/o European Quarters, Ward No. 9 Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S.-Chaibasa, Dist.-West Singhbhum, presently residing and working as Security Officer, Bata India Ltd. Hariana 5. Manjulika Chakraborty W/o Shri Prafulla Chakraborty, R/o Maya Villa, Subhas Colony, P.O. & P.S.-Mango, Town Jamshedpur, Dist.- Singhbhum East 6. Chhaya Banerjee, W/o Shri Sailesh Banerjee, R/o Charu Nirh Kando Hari, Gosta Tala, P.O & P.S.-Garia Town & Dist.-Kolkata (West Bengal) 7. Namita Chatterjee, W/o Shri Parimal Chatterjee, R/o 91/M/4 Cable Town, P.O. & P.S.-Golmuri Town Jamshedpur, Dist.-Singhbhum East 8. Geetashree Mallick, W/o Shri Chitranjan Mallick, R/o Church Road, Daltonganj, P.O. & P.S.-Daltonganj, Dist.-Palamau 9. Malayashree Banerjee, W/o Shri Sadhan Kumar Banerjee, Residing at Bank Colony Kokar, P.O. & P.S.-Kokar, Dist.-Ranchi … …. Respondents ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Appellant : Ms. Puja Agarwal, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Vibhor Mayank, Advocate ----- Oral Order 25 / Dated : 06.03.2025 From the earlier order dated 04.02.2025 it appears that an adjournment had been sought for by learned counsel for the appellant to verify regarding the life status of the appellant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that she has no instruction about of the appellant and she does not want to pursue with the instant appeal. Under the circumstance, this Misc. Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra