- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3241 WP No. 5225 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 5225 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: DR.UMA MAHESHWARI W/O A.MANIKANTAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT "A" BLOCK, 1161 SHOBHA TULIP APARTMENT, 24TH MAIN, J.P.NAGAR, 5TH PHASE, BENGALURU-560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. ARCHANA.K.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN, (GOVERNMENT OF INDIA), AT PLOT NO.21, FC-33, JASOLA, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, NEW DLEHI-110 025. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIR PERSON. 2. SMT SANDHYA VAIDYANATHAN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, W/O SRI VAIDYANATHAN.V., R/O A202, UKN ESPERANZA, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, THUBRAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 066. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GURURAJ YADRAVI., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3241 WP No. 5225 of 2017 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Archana.K.M., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Gururaj Yadravi., counsel for respondent No.1 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the Notice dated 19.01.2017 issued by the first respondent in No.8/161/2017/NCW/CP/NMG vide Annexure-A and to quash the proceedings in Case No.8/161/2017/NCW/CP/NMG pending before the first respondent. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Counsel Sri.Gururaj Yadravi., submits that the case that has been filed by the second respondent against the petitioner has been closed by the first respondent. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed furnishing the true copy of the final/ last reminder and the same may be placed on record and an appropriate order may be passed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3241 WP No. 5225 of 2017 Submission is noted. Memo is placed on record. 5. Because of the closure of the case that was filed by the second respondent against the petitioner, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 15