HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.2146 of 2024 Mausam ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 293 of 2024, under Sections 363, 366, 376 (3), 120B, 376D and 506 IPC, Section 3 (a)/4 (2) & 5 (g)/6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 3 (1) (w), 3 (2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Bahadrabad, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail. 4. This fact is admitted by learned State counsel. 5. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 2 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 07.01.2025 Jitendra