Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12880 (HP)

MOHAMMAD RIZVI v. SEEMA

CRMPM/907/2025 · 2025-06-06

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Mohammad Rizvi versus Seema Cr.M.P (M) No.907 of 2025 06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Hem Kanta Kaushal, Advocate, for the applicant/ petitioner. Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent. Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent by filing memo of appearance. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 58 days’ that has crept up in filing of the main revision petition. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of. Revision be registered. CR.R (FC) No. 2025 & Cr. MP No. 2025 Be registered. Issue notice. Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply/power of attorney. List on 11.07.2025. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) June 06, 2025 Judge (yogesh)