Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12879 (GAU)

PUSHPA MARKETING v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/3786/2022 · 2025-06-17

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010108172022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3786/2022 PUSHPA MARKETING REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR- SRI DIBAKAR ROY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, GANGA PATH, NORTH LAUMDING, P.O. AND P.S. LUMDING, DIST.- HOJAI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY- THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, NEW DELHI. 2:NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALILGAON REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY HEAD QUARTER MALIGAON GUWAHATI-11. 3:ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY HEAD QUARTER MALIGAON GUWAHATI-11. 4:THE CHIEF MATERIAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAYS MALIGAON HEAD QUARTER GUWAHATI-781011 KAMRUP(M) Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM. 5:THE DEPUTY CHIEF MATERIAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY PANDU GUWAHATI-12. 6:THE SR. DIVISIONAL MATERIAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY LAUMDING HOJAI ASSAM. 7:THE SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER/ P-WAY N.F. RAILWAY LUMDING HOJAI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J ISLAM, MR. N I KHAN,MR. S Z RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, RAILWAY, MR H GUPTA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 18.06.2025 Shri S.Z. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous. Also heard Shri H. Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the Railways. Matter is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant