KRISHNA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CO OPERATIVE DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/2982/2025 · 2025-03-24
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128781 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128781 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16716 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2982 of 2025 Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Co Operative Deptt. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing counsel for respondents. The petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:-
"It is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Opp. Party no. 3 i.e. Assistant Commissioner Evam Assistant Registrar, Rae Bareli to pay withheld salary from 01.07.1989 to 30.06.1990 and 1% additional commission from 1984 to the Petitioner according to circular dated 12.12.1984 and Rule 24(2) of U.P. Co- operative Collection Funds and Amin and other Employees Service Rules, 2002 as early as possible in the interest of justice." Shir Vinay Vajpayee, learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the petition has been filed without explaining the delay and latches of several decades. There is no whisper in the entire petition of explaining the delay and latches.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon a query being made by the Court, could not show from the pleadings that the delay and latches of several decades have been explained. Thus, the petition is dismissed on account of unexplained delay and latches.
Order Date :- 24.3.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench