Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128779 (ALL)

VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 11 OTHERS

WRIC/2683/2025 · 2025-03-19

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15886-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2683 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Onkar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. The land in question is a Minjumla Gata. The allegation is that private parties who are co-tenure holders are raising construction with the connivance of local authorities. 3. This is not a matter to be adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India so far as allegation against private parties are concerned. As regards official opposite parties, petitioner may approach the District Magistrate or the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ayodhya raising his grievance who may get the matter inquired as to whether there is any illegal interference by the police or not, if so, they shall do the needful. However, if it is not so then they shall inform the petitioner accordingly. Petitioner may pursue other remedies. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench