YESWANT KUMAR SONKER v. SMT. SUNITA SINGH HOLD THE POST OF DISTT. SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER, LKO.
CAPL/718/2025 · 2025-07-07
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38291 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 718 of 2025 Applicant :- Yeswant Kumar Sonker Opposite Party :- Smt. Sunita Singh Hold The Post Of Distt. Social Welfare Officer, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui,Prakhar Pratap Singh Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard Shri Gurfan Khan, learned counsel for the applicant and learned Standing Counsel.
2. This application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the
judgment and order dated 10.05.2024 passed on Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 3347 of 2024.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the directions of the writ Court has not been complied with in letter and spirit.
4. On the other hand, Shri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, while placing written instructions duly signed by Ms. Sunita Singh, District Social Welfare Officer, Lucknow dated 22.04.2025, informs that as per the Policy, the victim, who belongs to SC/ST community, is entitled for compensation of Rs.2 lac. It is further submitted that 50% of the said amount is to be paid just after lodging of the F.I.R. and 25% of the amount is to be paid after submission of charges sheet Rest of 25% will be paid after disposal of the case. It is submitted that in the present case, Rs.1,50,000/- has already been paid to the applicant and rest of 25% will be paid to him after disposal of the trial of F.I.R. No. 620 of 2023, under Sections 323, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow. The detail of receipt is also annexed with the aforesaid instructions. The aforesaid written instructions are taken on record.
5. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and going through the order of writ Court as well as contents of the written instructions, this Court is of the view that no contempt is made out.
6. The contempt application, accordingly, stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 7.7.2025 VKS Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench