BAIJNATH PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR AND 3 OTHERS
A227/1435/2025 · 2025-03-18
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128700 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128700 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15729 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1435 of 2025 Petitioner :- Baijnath Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Sultanpur And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Shukla,Kaushlendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the opposite party No.2 i.e. Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur to expeditiously decide the application dated 16.12.2024 under Sections 22, 23 & 227 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, filed in Case No.01413 of 2021 (Computerized Case No.202104680401413) (Buddhu Versus Gram Panchayat & Others) under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, according to law within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." Taking note of the fact that case in issue i.e. Case No. 01413 of 2021 (Computerized Case No.202104680401413) (Buddhu Versus Gram Panchayat & Others), was instituted under Section 24 of the Code of 2006 and as per Section 24(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the demarcation proceedings, being summary in nature, should preferably be decided within a period of three months, however, in the instant case, the application for demarcation has not been decided till date, which is pending since 2021, the respondent No.-2 is directed to consider and decide the pending Case, detailed above, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench