Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1287 (PAT)

Pradeep Kumar Choudhari @ Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./82022/2025 · 2026-03-13

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82022 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2025 Thana- DHORAIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar Choudhari @ Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary Son of Late Makeshwar Choudhary Resident of village- Jakha, Hirammi, Ps- Dhoraiya, Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 905 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2025 Thana- DHORAIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar S/O Mihilal Singh Resident of Village- Beli, Jakha, P.S.- Dhoraiya, Distt.- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 82022 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, A.P.P. (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 905 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 13-03-2026 Both the aforementioned cases are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 3. Petitioners apprehend arrest in Dhoraiya P. S. Case No. 5 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82022 of 2025(5) dt.13-03-2026 2/2 Sections 318(4), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. 4. As per F.I.R., these petitioners, who are ex-PDS dealers, did not distribute the foodgrains to the beneficiaries for several months despite taking their thumb impressions on e-POS machines. It is alleged that these petitioners are involved in black-marketing of 45.51 quintal wheat and 182.03 quintal rice. 5. Considering the nature and seriousness of allegation, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is refused. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T