SATNU AND ANOTHER v. BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 6 OTHERS
A227/1447/2025 · 2025-03-18
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128690 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128690 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15736 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1447 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satnu And Another Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Chairman And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Singh,Raghvendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dharmendra Singh,Dilip Kumar Pandey,Pradeep Tiwari Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondent(s), if any, is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main reliefs:-
"I) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to decide the Revision No. 327/2025, Computerized Case No. R2025104600327, 'Satnu & another Vs Kamaal Ahmad & others', pending in the court of the Board of Revenue, Lucknow, contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition, expeditiously within time stipulated by this Hon'ble High Court. ii) Direct the Opposite Party No.2 to take decision on the Application for Stay filed alongwith the Revision No. 327/2025, Computerized Case No. R2025104600327, 'Satnu & another Vs Kamaal Ahmad & others', pending in the court of the Board of Revenue, Lucknow, contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition, expeditiously within time stipulated by this Hon'ble High Court." Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case and also period of pendency of the case in issue as well as the fact that the petitioners are the senior citizens aged about 66 years and 60 years, respectively, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Revision No. 327/2025, Computerized Case No. R2025104600327 most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party say within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard, and also consider and decide the stay application pending in the said revision most expeditiously. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench