Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128670 (ALL)

RAMJEET v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/2535/2025 · 2025-03-24

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16610-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2535 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramjeet Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohak Srivastava,Shakeel Ahmad Jamal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner should implead the Consolidation Officer, Akbarpur, District-Ambedkar Nagar as opposite party during course of the day. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by interference of the District Officials in his alleged possession of Gata No.660 ad-measuring 0.1120 hectare situated at Village Sulempur (Suhurpur), Tehsil- Akbarpur, District-Ambedkar Nagar in violation of order dated 27.07.2023 passed by Consolidation Officer, Akbarpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar under Rule 109(A)(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Rules, 1954. As the proceedings before the Consolidation Officer are said to be pending, we direct the Consolidation Officer to conclude the aforesaid proceedings at the earliest say within a period of two months, if there is no legal impediment in this regard. If the petitioner has any grievance as regards interference in possession by any private party or seeks clarification of the said order with regard to interference by the District Authorities, he can raise the same before the Consolidation Officer concerned, who may consider it as per law. In the meantime, it is provided that the police shall only interfere if there is any law and order situation, apprehension of breach of peace, apprehension of commission of crime or the crime has been actually committed or there is any order of the Court to be complied with or if there is any other ground for valid interference then the authorities can interfere but only to that extent. We have not adjudicated the possession or otherwise of the petitioner or of any other private party. 4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 24.3.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench