Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128668 (MAD)

R. Raghu Ram Sharma v. The Superintendent of Police

WP(MD)/7752/2025 · 2025-03-21

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.7752 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.03.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.7752 of 2025 R.Raghu Ram Sharma ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram Road, Kajamalai Colony, Pudukottai, Tiruchirappalli - 620020. 2.The Inspector of Police, D-3, Samayapuram Police Station, Lalgudi, Utkotam, Samayapuram, Tiruchirappalli - 621112. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take necessary action on the petitioner's spot complaint dated 11.10.2022 lodged at the place of occurrence with the 2nd respondent police and subsequent representations dated 15.10.2022, 12.11.2022 and 24.02.2025 sent by the petitioner to the 1st and 2nd respondents, in light of the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7752 of 2025 Court of Indian in the case of Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Madhumitha For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to take necessary action on the petitioner's spot complaint, dated 11.10.2022 lodged at the place of occurrence with the 2nd respondent police and subsequent representations, dated 15.10.2022, 12.11.2022 and 24.02.2025 sent by the petitioner to the respondents 1 and 2. 2.According to the petitioner, the respondents failed to take necessary action on the petitioner's spot complaint, dated 11.10.2022, which was lodged at the place of occurrence with the 2nd respondent police. The petitioner has also sent subsequent representations, dated 15.10.2022, 12.11.2022 and 24.02.2025 to the respondents 1 and 2 and the same were not considered. Hence, this petition. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7752 of 2025 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner has not lodged any spot complaint on 11.10.2022. Without producing necessary records, the petitioner has sent a representation on 24.02.2025, for the occurrence took place on 11.10.2022. Hence, prays to dismiss the petition. 4.Since the occurrence took place in the year 2022, the petitioner has filed this petition only in the year 2025 without any records and any valid grounds. This Court finds no merit in the petition. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. 21.03.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7752 of 2025 To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram Road, Kajamalai Colony, Pudukottai, Tiruchirappalli - 620020. 2.The Inspector of Police, D-3, Samayapuram Police Station, Lalgudi, Utkotam, Samayapuram, Tiruchirappalli - 621112. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7752 of 2025 P.DHANABAL , J. PNM ORDER IN W.P(MD)No.7752 of 2025 21.03.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis