Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12865 (PNJ)

ANKIT KHANCHI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/1451/2021 · 2025-07-09

Deepinder Singh Nalwa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-1451-2021 223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1451-2021(O&M) Date of decision : 09.07.2025 Ankit Khanchi ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. G.N. Malik, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate; Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Saini, Advocate for respondent No.4. ***** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (Oral) In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned result dated 05.01.2021 (Annexure P-5) as well as impugned notice dated 06.01.2021 (Annexure P-6) for shortlisting of candidates for interview whereby the qualifying marks for Urdu language Section was wrongly fixed as 40% instead of 35%. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that similar issue has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.1792 of 2021 titled as Jagjeet Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, which was dismissed vide order dated 25.02.2021. -1- DIWAKER GULATI 2025.07.10 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1451-2021 3. In view of above, the present writ petition is also dismissed in terms of the aforesaid judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in Jagjeet Singh and others’ case (supra). 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed of. 09.07.2025 (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) d.gulati JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No -2- DIWAKER GULATI 2025.07.10 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document