M/S SIDDHARTH CONSTRUCTION v. CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD
WP227/211/2021 · 2025-05-01
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12865 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12865 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1-
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 211 of 2021 1 - M/s Siddharth Construction Through Proprietor- Narendra Kumar Parakh S/o Late Panchilalji Parakh, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Parakh Mansion, Gudhiyari, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Housing Board Through Housing Commissioner, Headquarter Paryawas Bhawan Sector-19, North Block, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Division-3, Raipur Circle, 2nd Floor, Commercial Complex, Saddu, Near Science Center, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur,
Chhattisgarh 3 - The Estate Officer Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Estate Management Zone-3, Raipur, C/o Division- 3, Raipur Circle 2nd Floor, Commercial Complex Saddu, Near Science Center Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None For Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 01.05.2025 1) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That, the Honble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record pertaining to the case of the petitioner. SMT NIRMALA RAO
-2- 10.2 That, the Honble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and direct the trial court to obtained the demarcation report from the concern Tehsildar at the earliest and thereafter decide the case within a time frame of four months since the original suit was instituted 25.04.2006, in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.” 2) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the concerned Tehsildar has already submitted demarcation report before the concerned Court and accordingly, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3) Recording the submission made by Mr. Patel, this writ petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi