Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:25701 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 3067 of 2025 Applicant :- Sanjay Rathaur Alias Sanjeev Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rohit Mishra,Vipin Chandra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Supplementary affidavit has been filed today is taken on record. Heard Sri Vipin Chandra Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhishek Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 428 of BNSS has been filed to quash the order dated 7.10.2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.12, DAA, in Sessions Trial No. 325 of 2012 (State v. Arvind & others), arising out of Case Crime No. 134 of 2012, under Sections 392 and 412 of IPC, Police Station Fatehabad, District Agra, whereby the non-bailable warrants has been issued. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned order has been passed by the court without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served and without issuing any summon or bailable warrant, direct N.B.W. has been issued. It is further submitted that applicant was on bail at the time of issuing non-bailable warrant. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard. It is further submitted that order of the non-bailable warrant has been passed on 7.10.2015 without satisfying the service of summons or bailable warrants itself and reason to believe from absconding the process of the court. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 have opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within four weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of four weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Akram Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKRAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad