[2025:RJ-JP:15685] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 4172/2025 Vijay Singh S/o Shri Veer Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o I.D.S.M.T. Colony, Chhoti Basti, Pushkar, District Ajmer. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer) ……...Accused-Petitioner/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 08/04/2025 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused- applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.355/2023 registered at Police Station Pushkar District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Section 8/29 of NDPS Act. 2. The first bail application was dismissed vide order dated 13.02.2025. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the co-accused in the instant matter, from whom the recovery was made has already been enlarged on bail. It is further submitted that the quantity recovered is less than commercial. Therefore, the applicant is ought to be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent-State vehemently opposing the contentions made by the counsel [2025:RJ-JP:15685] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4172/2025] representing the accused-applicant and has submitted that there is no material change in circumstances. Nevertheless, six criminal antecedents are recorded/pending against the accused-applicant. Lastly, it is submitted that charge-sheet is filed in the matter. 4. Heard and considered. 5. In light of the foregoing facts and circumstances of the matter in hand, and taking note of the fact that there are approximately six criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant; that the accused-applicant had been absconding for a period of approximately one year; that the co- accused so enlarged on bail is on distinguishable pedestal as that of the accused-applicant herein, this Court is not inclined to allow the present bail application. 6. In view of the above, the instant second bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-293