Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128605 (ALL)

RAM PRASAD UPADHAYAY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FINANCE DEPTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/2626/2025 · 2025-04-25

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23920-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2626 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Prasad Upadhayay Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Finance Deptt. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar,Shyam Shankar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. After availing all the remedies and after decision of the arbitration proceedings under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, in which he did not get any interim relief, now the petitioner is ready to receive the compensation, as awarded on 18.09.2015, as informed by the petitioner's counsel. Let the opposite party No.4, who is said to be the competent authority, pay the compensation, which is payable to the petitioner. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner invites our attention towards an order passed by the Arbitrator under Section 3G(5) and 6 of the National Highways Act, 1956 in Case No.01; Ram Niranjan and Another Vs. Union of India, wherein according to the petitioner, his Gata has also been discussed, as also the rate at which the compensation is paid, we do not express any opinion in this regard. If it is permissible, the petitioner may raise his claim before the opposite party No.4, who may look into it, however, if it is impermissible, then the opposite party No.4 shall inform the petitioner in writing. In either eventuality, the aforesaid exercise be completed within one month. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 25.4.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench