Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010108652025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1756/2025 CHAND RATAN SINGHANIA S/O- LATE SRIKISHAN DAS SINGHANIA R/O- SIVA MARKET S.S. ROAD FANCY BAZAR P.O. AND P.S.- PAN BAZAR PIN- 781001 DIST.- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. VERSUS RIJU PRASAD SARMA SON OF LATE BRAJA NATH KUMAR RESIDENT OF KAMAKHYA P.O. AND P.S.- PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-1 DIST.- KAMRUP(METRO) ASSAM. 2:DHRABA JYOTI GOUTAM SON OF SRI INDRA SARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AGDOLA P.O. AND P.S.- BAIHATA CHARIALI DIST.- KAMRUP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR S DEY Advocate for : MR. R K JAIN appearing for RIJU PRASAD SARMA Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : CRP(IO)/437/2024 CHAND RATAN SINGHANIA S/O- LATE SRIKISHAN DAS SINGHANIA R/O- SIVA MARKET S.S. ROAD FANCY BAZAR P.O. AND P.S.- PAN BAZAR PIN- 781001 DIST.- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. VERSUS RIJU PRASAD SARMA AND ANR SON OF LATE BRAJA NATH KUMAR RESIDENT OF KAMAKHYA P.O. AND P.S.- PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-1 DIST.- KAMRUP(METRO) ASSAM. 2:DHRABA JYOTI GOUTAM SON OF SRI INDRA SARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AGDOLA P.O. AND P.S.- BAIHATA CHARIALI DIST.- KAMRUP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. B BORAH Advocate for : MR. R K JAIN appearing for RIJU PRASAD SARMA AND ANR Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 15.10.2025 1. Heard Mr. B. Borah, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. K. Jain, the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This application under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the applicant for setting aside of the abatement of this case on the death of the respondent No.2. 3. I have heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides. 4. The reasons shown by the applicant in the application under Order 22 Rule of 9 the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 appears to be just reasons justifying a favourable order to the applicant in this case. 5. Hence, considering the reasons shown in the instant application, the abatement of the case on the death of respondent No. 2 is hereby set aside and this Interlocutory Application is allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant