Challari Koteswara Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/9465/2020 · 2025-03-24
T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12860 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12860 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010153182020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 9465/2020 Between: Challari Koteswara Rao, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI (SC FOR ZPP MPP AND GRAM PAN)
2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
2
The Court made the following order:
The present writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents No.2 to 5 in resorting to evict the petitioner from his land in an extent of Ac.0.18 cents situated in Sy.No.258 of Chakrayagudem Village, Pedavegi Mandal, West Godavari District, without following due process of law. 2. The petitioner claims that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.18 cents in R.S.No.258 of Chakrayagudem Village, Pedavegi Mandal, West Godavari District by virtue of D-Form Patta issued in his favour in proceedings L.D.No.123/139/06 dated
20.06.2006. He further claims that he has been enjoying the said property without any interference whatsoever from anybody. It is the further case of the petitioner that the respondents No.2 to 5 tried to interfere with his possession on the premise that the land of the petitioner is required for construction of Village Secretariat. In furtherance thereto, it is alleged that the respondents tried to interfere with his possession without issuing any notice or without following the due process of law. In those circumstances, the petitioner approached this Court by filing this writ petition. 3. This Court, by order dated 29.05.2020, directed the parties to maintain status quo with regard to subject land. The said interim order is subsisting till date. 4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue placed instructions dated 22.03.2025 furnished by the
3
Tahsildar, Pedavegi Mandal. On perusal of the said instructions, it is clear that the respondents did not identify the subject land belonging to the petitioners for construction of the Village Secretariat as alleged by the petitioner. 5. The instructions furnished by the learned Government Pleader for Revenue is placed on record and in view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of interim order dated 29.05.2020, no further orders are required.
6. With the above observation, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Dt.24.03.2025 KGR
4