Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128573 (ALL)

SMT. MADHU RANI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/2592/2025 · 2025-03-24

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17075-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2592 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Madhu Rani And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shrawan Kumar,Nuzhat Ali Siddiqui,Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 that they may not provide any help to the opposite party no. 5 in interfering with peaceful possession of the petitioners over the Gata's mentioned in the relief clause. The petitioner may approach the District Magistrate / Collector, Sitapur raising his grievance giving specific details as to how the opposite parties no. 2 to 4, if at all, are facilitating interference in the possession of the petitioners by opposite party no. 5, who may look into the matter and do the needful as per law, as these are not matters where any adjudication can take place under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, or the petitioners may seek such other remedies as may be prescribed in law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench