[2025:RJ-JP:14141] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4164/2025 Pramod Kumar @ Priyanshu S/o Premraj @ Premdas, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Near Naveen School, Koli Pada, Gangapur City. (At Present Confined In District Jail Gangapurcity) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4310/2025 Smt. Rekha Devi W/o Late Pooran Chand, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Meena Mohalla, Nasiya Colony, Gangapur City, Police Station Kotwali Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Gangapur City). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal, Adv., and Mr. Santosh Srivastava, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.73/2025 registered at Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21, 8/25 and 8/29 of NDPS Act. [2025:RJ-JP:14141] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4164/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that alleged recovered contraband smack (23.41 gms) is below commercial quantity. They further submit that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. They argue that the petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that one other criminal case has been registered against the petitioner- Smt. Rekha Devi. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that alleged recovered contraband smack is below commercial quantity and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Pramod Kumar @ Priyanshu S/o Premraj @ Premdas and 2. Smt. Rekha Devi W/o Late Pooran Chand shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the [2025:RJ-JP:14141] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4164/2025] sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in second week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/259 & S-397