Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128558 (PNJ)

PINKY RANI @ PINKI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/21535/2020 · 2025-11-17

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-21535 IN TH 237 Pinky Rani @ State of Punja CORAM: Present : HARPREET 1. Constitution directing the due to death while in serv and the petiti herself and he 2. petitioner has Mahinder wa were born na 1 535-2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGA Rani @ Pinki VERSUS Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HA Mr. B.S Bhalla, Advocate for the Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been fil tution of India for issuance of a wr g the respondents to appoint the petit death of her husband on 24.06.2020 in service as ‘Safai Karamchari’ with petitioner does not have any other so and her minor son. Learned State Counsel at the er has no relationship with the dece der was married to Smt. Kirna and out orn namely Ruhi and Nitasha, respec NJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH CWP-21535-2020 Date of decision:17.11.2025 .....Petitioner SUS .....Responden E HARPREET SINGH BRAR the petitioner. unjab-State. een filed under Article 226/227 of the a writ in the nature of mandamus e petitioner on compassionate ground .2020, who died in prime of his life i’ with Municipal Corporation, Moga ther source of income to take care of at the very outset submits that the e deceased Mahinder and in fact late nd out of their wedlock two daughters respectively. Learned counsel further .2025 itioner ondents of the mus round is life Moga are of at the ct late ghters urther PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.11.18 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-21535 submits that w was nominat raised by the involves disp evidence, wh 3. withdraw the accordance w 4. withdrawn w 5. disposed of. November P.C 2 535-2020 s that wife of petitioner Kirna died on minated by deceased Mohinder qua by the petitioner warrants proper adju es disputed questions of fact that ne , which cannot be adjudicated by thi Learned counsel for the petit aw the present petition with liberty ance with law. In view of the above, the pr awn with liberty aforesaid. Pending miscellaneous applica ed of. 17, 2025 Whether speaking/r Whether Reportable ied on 01.12.2011 and her minor baby r qua his service benefits. The claim r adjudication, since the present case hat necessitate the parties to adduce by this Court. petitioner at this stage wishes to iberty to avail alternative remedy in the present petition is dismissed as pplications, if any, shall also stand (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE king/reasoned. : Yes/No ortable. : Yes/No r baby claim t case dduce es to dy in ed as stand RAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.11.18 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document